We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking the Accept button, you agree to us doing so. More info on our cookie policy

Is APRS better then Meshtastic

Published: Jun 13, 2025 by Phil VK6DEV

While gearing up to test Meshtastic over the last couple of weeks, an interesting thought kept coming into my mind. Meashtastic seems very simlar to APRS messaging.

Which is better and why?

APRS

  • Requires an Amateur Radio license or private use frequency.
  • 2m APRS has a range in the coastal areas of WA is typically more like 50-100km.
  • APRS hardware is more expensive than Meshtastic equipment.
  • All Amateur Radio communications must not be encrypted, including APRS messages.

Meshtastic

  • Does not require a license.
  • Is “Long Range” actually long range? or is it long range based on the power output of the devices.
  • Meshtastic nodes are generally cheaper than APRS capabile Ham Radios.
  • Meshtastic communications are generally encrypted with a public key or they are privately encrypted with a user share key.

Observations

  • Neither technology is in active use in Western Australia. There are very few nodes/users and the ones that are there are making very little noise.

Conclusions

It’s little early to say if APRS is better than Meshtastic at this early stage. Check back later for updated conclusions.

Latest Posts

Meshtastic is ok but now
Meshtastic is ok but now

Meshtastic seems like a great technology and in some use cases it excels.

Is APRS better then Meshtastic
Is APRS better then Meshtastic

While gearing up to test Meshtastic over the last couple of weeks, an interesting thought kept coming into my mind. Meashtastic seems very simlar to APRS messaging.

Meshtastic Desert
Meshtastic Desert

It’s official, I live in a Meshtastic Desert!